Page 17 - OUSD LCAP 2016-19

Page 3 of 119
Section 1: Stakeholder Engagement

Meaningful engagement of parents, pupils, and other stakeholders, including those representing the subgroups identified in Education Code section 52052, is
critical to the LCAP and budget process. Education Code sections 52060(g), 52062 and 52063 specify the minimum requirements for school districts; Education
Code sections 52066(g), 52068 and 52069 specify the minimum requirements for county offices of education, and Education Code section 47606.5 specifies the
minimum requirements for charter schools. In addition, Education Code section 48985 specifies the requirements for translation of documents.

Instructions: Describe the process used to consult with parents, pupils, school personnel, local bargaining units as applicable, and the community and how this
consultation contributed to development of the LCAP or annual update. Note that the LEA’s goals, actions, services and expenditures related to the state priority
of parental involvement are to be described separately in Section 2. In the annual update boxes, describe the stakeholder involvement process for the review,
and describe its impact on, the development of the annual update to LCAP goals, actions, services, and expenditures.

Guiding Questions:

1) How have applicable stakeholders (e.g., parents and pupils, including parents of unduplicated pupils and unduplicated pupils identified in Education
Code section 42238.01; community members; local bargaining units; LEA personnel; county child welfare agencies; county office of education foster
youth services programs, court-appointed special advocates, and other foster youth stakeholders; community organizations representing English
learners; and others as appropriate) been engaged and involved in developing, reviewing, and supporting implementation of the LCAP?
2) How have stakeholders been included in the LEA’s process in a timely manner to allow for engagement in the development of the LCAP?
3) What information (e.g., quantitative and qualitative data/metrics) was made available to stakeholders related to the state priorities and used by the LEA
to inform the LCAP goal setting process? How was the information made available?
4) What changes, if any, were made in the LCAP prior to adoption as a result of written comments or other feedback received by the LEA through any of
the LEA’s engagement processes?
5) What specific actions were taken to meet statutory requirements for stakeholder engagement pursuant to Education Code sections 52062, 52068, and
47606.5, including engagement with representatives of parents and guardians of pupils identified in Education Code section 42238.01?
6) What specific actions were taken to consult with pupils to meet the requirements 5 CCR 15495(a)?
7) How has stakeholder involvement been continued and supported? How has the involvement of these stakeholders supported improved outcomes for
pupils, including unduplicated pupils, related to the state priorities?

Involvement Process Impact on LCAP
Curriculum Council: The Curriculum Council is comprised largely of teachers, District and site
• September 29, 2015 leadership. Through the involvement of the curriculum council, the input
• October 27, 2015 received was focused around ensuring students have access to college and
• November 10, 2015 career course, offering wide range of courses/programs and professional
• January 26, 2016 development for teachers. Hence, actions and services included in the LCAP
• February 23, 2016 additional staffing, professional development for teachers in the area of
• March 22, 2016 differentiated instruction for advanced learners, GATE, AVID, Vital Link,
• April 26, 2016 Robotics and Career and Technical Education, and Visual Performing Arts
• May 24, 2016 program.